The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. 1) As to the forgery of a private document, the event of a falsified document, and the uttering of a forged public document, the Defendant obtained F’s consent from F to the preparation and event of a lease agreement in the name of F, and the use of the resident registration certificate.

Even if the Defendant did not obtain the above consent from the actual F.

Even if the Defendant held the F’s resident registration certificate and received the F from E, the Defendant actually received the above consent from F.

was known.

2) As to the fraud in the judgment of the court below, the defendant did not have conspired with E, etc. to commit fraud, and did not have the intent to deceive the victim.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) Determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts in the judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the forgery of a private document, the uttering of a falsified document, and the uttering of a forged official document, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i., ① the court of the court of the court of the court below: “I do not know F and did not introduce F to the defendant;” ② the defendant, on March 1, 201, who was prior to the crime of this case, forged another’s resident registration certificate by using the defendant’s photograph in the same manner and used a forged resident registration certificate and forged and used a lease contract under another person’s name (the judgment was finalized on July 10, 201 on December 18, 201). ③ The defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor with prison labor for the crime of forging a falsified official document by using the defendant’s photograph, and exercised a forged and falsified resident registration certificate under the name of 301.4.