Defendant

A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by imprisonment for two months, respectively.

An application by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud in this court, and the judgment on March 30, 2015 became final and conclusive.

Defendant

B On November 18, 2014, this Court was sentenced to the charge of forging private documents, etc. and sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment on January 29, 2015.

Defendant

C On October 30, 2014, this Court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment due to the charge of forging private documents, etc., and the judgment was finalized on November 7, 2014.

Criminal facts

Defendants and H have gathered to have money divided by acquiring money by means of using forged I’s lease agreement, resident registration certificate, etc. as security for lease deposit.

Accordingly, Defendant C introduced G to lend money as security for lease deposit, and H decided to be the most as I.

1. The event of the above investigation document and fraud around November 7, 2012, by a notary public of 101, J building 101, in the office of the law firm K, and the defendant A, introduced by the defendant C, to the victim G who was introduced by the defendant C, “70 million won is changed. The deposit money of 101, Dong 508, Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the deposit money of 101, 500,000 won is provided as security.

I, the owner of the deposit office, has been conducting notarial acts.

“A false statement,” submitted a forged I’s lease agreement, and Defendant H pretended as the lessor I’s resident registration certificate while presenting a forged I’s resident registration certificate.

However, Defendant A did not have entered into a lease agreement with L Apartment No. 101 Dong 508, and Defendant A did not have any intent or ability to repay even if she borrowed money from the injured party, and Defendant H was merely the most likely to deceive the injured party.

The Defendants received 70 million won from the injured party to the Saemaul Treasury account (M) of Defendant A on the same day.

2. The date, time, and place at the event of a forged official document, H runs as if the document was carried out by Defendant B, A, and I according to the public offering, and on August 2012.