A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2016, the Defendant had his automobile registration number plate in front of the B observer car owned by himself in arrears with automobile tax, and had the Defendant kept the vehicle registration number plate in custody. The Defendant had the vehicle registration number plate forged to affix it to the said car.

Defendant 1 put in a white plastic board (34 cm in width, 17 cm in length) at one’s house located in the wife population C at the time of the above day, the Defendant 1 put in “D” by using a white paint on that day.

Accordingly, the defendant forged one copy plate of the vehicle, which is an air, for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. On May 4, 2016, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, posted a forged D Motor Vehicle Registration Number Board as stated in paragraph 1, as if he/she were duly issued a forged D Motor Vehicle No. 1, and subsequently, on May 4, 2016, the Defendant, at the time and place, exercised a forged car No. 1, a motor vehicle registration number board, which was an air defense, by operating from the house of the suspect in the wife population C to the road of both 2325 and IC, to the front of the 2325 vehicle number board.

3. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall forge, alter, or use unlawfully a motor vehicle registration number plate, or trade, assist in the trade of, receive, or use counterfeited or altered motor vehicle registration number plates;

Nevertheless, the defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, has used the D Motor Vehicle Registration Number Board forged, such as Paragraph 1, on the observer car.

4. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, on May 4, 2016, the Defendant operated the B observer car that was not covered by mandatory insurance to the 2325th IC road in front of the 2325 area from the Defendant’s house located in the wife population C at the time of Ma-si around 05:00 to the Defendant’s house in the wife population C.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement and seizure protocol, and mandatory insurance inquiry pictures;

1. Criminal facts;