Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On August 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support of the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support of the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support for the Support

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant was in possession of the document forgery of the private document and the uttering of the above investigation document at C’s agency located in the Gyeonggi-do Council around March 13, 2012

D In applying for a new purchase of mobile phone service in D’s name E using his/her identification card pictures, the name and seal of D was affixed to the applicant’s customer column after entering “D”, “F”, “D in the resident registration number column,” etc. in the name column of the new contract for the SK Telecom Mobile Service and the contract for the short-term installment sale contract, etc., and then issuing the said agency’s employees to the applicant customer column.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) forged the “new service contract” in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations; and (b) performed a short term installment transaction contract.

2. The Defendant applied for a new mobile phone entry in the name of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. to the victim, as set forth in the above paragraph (1), at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1).

However, the defendant did not have obtained the permission or consent for the lending of name from D, and even if he was provided with mobile phone service from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the use fee and the end payment.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and had the victim receive mobile phone services from March 13, 2012 to September 19, 2012, and did not pay an amount equivalent to KRW 1,262,920.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;