logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.18 2015고정17
출판물에의한명예훼손등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

The facts charged of the instant case [basic facts] Diplomatic Association in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “E”) was established as a branch church on December 13, 1972. The above church purchased the land due to the donation of new islands and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of F or G, which is the supervisor of the Defendant’s religious order, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant’s religious order. The above land was determined to be 198 square meters prior to Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C (hereinafter “instant land”). The building of five-story religious facilities on the ground of Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”) was constructed on the instant land around 1993 due to the donation of the new church, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant’s religious order.

A school juristic person H (hereinafter referred to as "the above school juristic person") is a school juristic person established on January 20, 1982 after obtaining permission for its establishment on December 26, 1981 with the aim of conducting professional new education and general university education by the defendant's religious order.

On the other hand, when basic property for profit-making purposes for applying for authorization for the comprehensive university of the above IB, the defendant's religious order completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the above IBB on September 10, 1996 with respect to the land of this case, and on September 12, 1996 with respect to the building of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the above IBB.

However, there was a dispute between the F pastors under the supervision of the defendant's religious order and his relatives, J pastors and K pastors, and K pastors established a new religious order (after the change to M "E" under the supervision of the J pastors (hereinafter "victim's religious order"), separate from the defendant's religious order, they now move to M "E" under the supervision of the J pastors, and the J pastors around that time.

arrow