1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by D.

1. Basic facts

(a) Status 1 of the Parties E is the Franc Association under the Franc Association International Headquarters around 1963 (hereinafter referred to as “I religious order”).

(1) On February 28, 2003, the Plaintiff established a church and served as a supervisor (representative) and served as the supervisor of the said church from March 5, 2003. However, on November 14, 2006, when the said international headquarters appointed a H pastor as the supervisor of the said church, the said church amended the above church rules on June 25, 2007, and was reappointed as a supervisor of the G pastor on November 20, 2007. The said international headquarters was appointed as supervisor of the said church on August 2008, and on August 2008, the said international headquarters was appointed as supervisor of the said church, while the said church and the international headquarters mutually conflicted with each other, G pastors were “Defendant Religious Organization” (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Religious Order”).

Around December 2014, the above international headquarters changed its name and prepared and delivered a document stating that “the supervision of the F church is H pastor and the supervision of the defendant religious order is a G pastor.” 2) The defendant educational foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant educational foundation”) is an educational foundation established on January 20, 1982 with the aim of providing the first religious order with professional education and general university education.

3) The real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”).

(B) On December 1972, the Plaintiff located in the religious order was established as a branch church of the first religious order. (B) The Plaintiff purchased the land owned by Shindo, J, K, etc. as the donation, etc., and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the first religious order E or at the time the Plaintiff was the supervisor of the first religious order, and again completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the first religious order due to donation. The said land became the land of this case after division or merger, and the said land became the land of this case, and the two real estate listed in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”; hereinafter referred to as the “each real estate”).