The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is without merit that the defendant committed an act of disturbance for revocation at a police box, such as taking a bath to a police officer at the time, or sprinking a police officer who restrains drinking.

2. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an act of disturbance at a police station, which is a public official, under the influence of alcohol, while drunkly under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) the defendant was at the time to have been issued a penalty payment notification due to the Defendant’s act of disturbance in the vicinity of the police station; (b) was urged by E, a police officer who had been on duty in the place to avoid disturbance; (c) but (d) the police officer was seated before the entrance of the police box without return to his house to stop and stop the noise; and (d) the police officer who continued to stop it, took a bath and booming it.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.