Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 19:40 on August 31, 2014, within the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station Down-gu, Seoul, and at around 19:40, there is a complaint to the facts charged that issued a light crime bar as a nearby disturbance, and the facts charged are “contested.” However, according to the E’s written statement and the “written notice of the reasons for non-prosecution” submitted by the Defendant, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied the D police box to a nearby disturbance on August 31, 2014, which was issued a written notice of a light crime, and deemed to have not returned to the police box, but failed to return to the police box. However, it does not seem that the Defendant voluntarily found the D police box.

However, whether or not the defendant has been found or not is merely a factual fact, and it does not constitute an act to determine whether the state of the government office's revocation is a disturbance, and even if it is deleted, it is judged that it does not affect the guarantee of the defendant's right to defense. Therefore, the above statement without going through the amendment procedure of indictment

A police officer E, who renders a bath and refrains from drinking a fright, proposed that he/she be able to repeatedly and repeatedly take a fright, fright, bitch fright, bitch bitch bitch bitch, etc., and frighted to have him/her invalid. However, the police officer, who continued to stop the fright at the entrance of the police box, fright the fright to stop so that he/she can stop at the entrance of the police box, and who continued to stop drinking, had the fright of revocation at the police box, which is a government office, for about three hours.

Summary of Evidence

1. On August 31, 2014, the Defendant of the E’s written statement asserts that, inasmuch as he/she received a penalty payment notification on suspicion of disturbance of drinking alcohol, etc., he/she did not engage in an act of disturbance of liquor revocation from around 19:40 on August 31, 2014 to around 3 hours from around 19:40 on August 31, 2014.

According to the notice of penalty payment submitted by the defendant, a penalty payment notice is received on August 31, 2014 on the suspicion that the F committed an act such as disturbance of drinking alcohol at around 19:45.