logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.04 2014고정848
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won, and by a fine of 90,000 won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A (the 65 years of age) of the 2014 High 848 is a non-regular worker, and Defendant B (the 56 years of age) is a single-commercial worker.

On March 22, 2014, the Defendants 17:00, and 17:00, and 17:00 on the same day, Defendant B, at the Ansan-gu Police Station C police box of the Ansan-gu Police Station, made it difficult for police officers to see that Defendant B, a police officer, who did not give a warning to the issue of a light crime, did not send a door to the police officer, and received a fine. Defendant A sought to call for a door-to-faceb.

피고인들은 2014. 3. 22. 17:38경 안산시 단원구 D에 있는 관공서인 안산단원경찰서 C파출소에 술에 취하여 찾아가 피고인 A가 “소장 누구야 , 왜 불쌍한 사람을 괴롭혀 ”라며 시비를 걸어 경찰공무원인 경위 E이 귀가할 것을 요구하자, 피고인 A는 “이 쌍놈의 새끼들, 씨발놈들 니네 가만 안둔다, 너희들 아버지뻘이다 이새끼들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 수회에 걸친 경찰관의 귀가요

Until 17:45 on the same day, the state of refusal to listen and the state of being taken was about seven minutes of the revocation disturbance.

Defendant

B B B B B B B B B With the same defendant

The government refused to listen and "I have been in force, I will not have Neman," and performed a disturbance while under the influence of alcohol in the government offices.

2. Defendant B, “2014, 850, 2014, 850,” is a habitual offender, such as searching for the police box at the time of the withdrawal of alcohol and breaking the spawn.

Although the Defendant was aware of the disturbance at a police box of the Ansan-gu Police Station, a government office, the relevant Defendant, from around 10:12 on March 24, 2014 to 13:20 on the same day, recommended him/her to take the influence of alcohol within the police box located within the relevant police box located within the Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, the relevant police station, and to return home without any justifiable reason, but the Defendant refused to take the influence of alcohol and continued to engage in the act of disturbance of revocation within the relevant police box.

3.

arrow