1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A entered the real estate set forth in the [Attachment A] list, and the Defendant B set out the above list Nos. 2.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into each of the following lease agreements with the Defendants (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) and delivered each of the leased objects to the Defendants:

[Attachment 5] 163,30 won, 160 won, 200 won, 260 won, 205, 300 won, 368,00 won, 200 won, 260 won, 260, 290 won, 200 won, 163, 30 won, 330 won, 168, 200 won, 193, 193, 250 won, 250 won, 205, 46: 16: 28, 160, 300 won, 40, 200 won, 193, 194, 404, 46: 205, 16: 30, 605, 206, 205, 196, 4.4, 44, 204, 204, 205, 2005 won, 6.

B. At the time of each of the instant lease agreements, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to terminate the lease agreement in cases where the Defendants were in arrears for more than three consecutive months.

C. However, by December 2014, Defendant A did not pay for seven months, Defendant B’s KRW 1,652,970 for six months, Defendant C’s KRW 1,683,36 for eight months, Defendant D’s KRW 615,030 for six months, Defendant E’s KRW 1,123,340 for six months, and Defendant F’s KRW 819,374 for six months.

The complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant A, B, C, E, and F: Each confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the above facts of recognition, each of the instant lease agreements was terminated according to the Plaintiff’s intent of termination.