logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.12 2015가합65441
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A entered the real estate set forth in the [Attachment A] list, and the Defendant B set out the above list Nos. 2.

Reasons

The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants as indicated in the table of the lease agreement (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) and delivered each of the lease objects to the Defendants.

The Defendants entered the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants that the Defendants were 468,210 won on April 24, 2013, 205, 00 won and 517,200 won and 2 of the real estate listed in the [Attachment A] List 11,243,000 won on February 11, 2014 (personal portion: KRW 2,942,00) as of the date of the lease contract of the object of lease (payment in installments) Nos. 468,79,00 won (personal portion: KRW 2,693,00) and 3 real estate listed in the above List 5,200 won on January 2, 2014, each of the real estate was 468,210 won on April 23, 2013, 195,000 won on April 24, 2013, 203,304 or more of the above real estate lease agreement No. 230445.27.244.

However, by June 2015, Defendant A did not pay 3,746,380 won for seven months; Defendant B 3,661,570 won for eight months; Defendant C 1,140,632 won for seven months; and Defendant D 1,91,200 won for eight months.

The complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

Therefore, since each of the instant lease agreements was terminated according to the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention of termination, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each leased real estate to the Plaintiff.

Defendant A and D did not submit a written answer and did not appear on the date of pleading, deeming that they led to a confession of the facts constituting the cause of the claim pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and pursuant to Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, Defendant B and C received notification of the date by public notice under Articles 194 through 196 of the Civil Procedure Act and did not appear on the date of pleading. As such, Article 208 of the

arrow