1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A entered the real estate set forth in the [Attachment A] list, and the Defendant B set out the above list Nos. 2.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into each of the following lease agreements with the Defendants (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) and delivered each of the leased objects to the Defendants:

The lease deposit (payment in installments) monthly rent Nos. 19,250 won (Defendant) in the sequence 22,08,000 won 149,860 won in the table 2 B of the real estate listed in the table 2 of the above table 2 of December 28, 2012, the lease deposit (payment in installments) No. 19,416,00 won in the table 3 of the above list 19,250 won in 19,250 won in the above list 19,250 won in the real estate No. 3 of the above list 19,416,00 won in December 23, 2014 (payment in installments):

B. At the time of each of the instant lease agreements, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to terminate the lease agreement in cases where the Defendants were in arrears for more than three consecutive months.

C. However, by July 2015, Defendant A did not pay the difference of KRW 1,029,170 for six months; KRW 1,308,390 for six months; and KRW 1,035,960 for six months. D.

The complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant A and C: Each judgment made by each confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act): Defendant B by service (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the above facts of recognition, since each of the instant lease agreements was terminated in accordance with the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each leased real estate to the Plaintiff.