logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.20 2014가합68443
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A’s real estate listed in the Appendix 1, the Defendant B’s real estate listed in the Appendix 2, and the real estate listed in the Appendix 2.

Reasons

The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement as described below (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) with the Defendants except Defendant F and Defendant G, and H (hereinafter “Lessees of this case”), respectively, and delivered each of the leased objects to the lessee of this case.

Now, Now, Now, 141,50 won, 50 won, 150 won, 23,064,00 won, 24,00 won, 157,00 won, 250 won, 157,050 won, 2 attached Table Nos. 2 B, 2, 2, 2014, 3, 141,50 won, 365, 160 won, 46, 205, 165, 206, 3, 160, 200 won, 50 won, 205, 165, 170, 170, 170, 175, 46, 206, 3, 206, 160, 306, 160, 305, 205, 170, 170, 45, 28, 2015, 16

However, until August 2014, Defendant A, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant C, KRW 98,520 for six months, KRW 1,245,730 for six months, KRW 706,090 for six months, Defendant D, Defendant E, KRW 1,118,750 for six months, and KRW 610,550 for six months, respectively.

H In February 26, 2014, the death of February 26, 2014, Defendant F and Defendant G jointly inherited the H’s property.

The complaint of this case, which stated the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each lease agreement with the said Defendants on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

Therefore, since each of the instant lease contracts was terminated upon the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the contract, the Defendant A, as indicated in the attached Table 1, and the Defendant.

arrow