1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A entered the real estate set forth in the [Attachment A] list, and the Defendant B set out the above list Nos. 2.

The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants as indicated in the table of the lease agreement (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) and delivered each of the lease objects to the Defendants.

(4) The Defendants stated the above 40,640,80 won, 60, 640, 800 won, 60, 6408, 408, 6408, 640, 408, 6408, 400 won, 608, 640, 408, 608, 640, 640, 33 real estate 80, 60, 640, 80, 408, 60, 408, 60, 640, 640, 640, 640, 80, 80, 408, 60, 640, 80, 405, 60, 804, 608, 408, 604, 604, 608, 408, 3, 408, 2004.

However, by October 2015, Defendant A delays the amount of KRW 8,692,360 for 20 months; KRW 8,599,380 for 18 months; KRW 9,577,720 for 20 months; KRW 9,043,320 for 19 months for Defendant D; KRW 8,453,340 for 18 months for Defendant E; KRW 8,656,050 for Defendant F; KRW 8,26,750 for Defendant G; KRW 20 for 20 months.

The complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

Therefore, since each of the instant lease agreements was terminated according to the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each leased real estate to the Plaintiff.