logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.11.01 2018구합6397
공공형어린이집선정취소처분취소
Text

1. On April 24, 2018, the Defendant’s revocation of the designation of a public child care center to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the representative and the president of Ulsan-gu C Child Care Center located in Ulsan-gu B (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”).

B. From September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2018, child care centers of this case have been selected and operated as public child care centers (a system that enables infants to function as excellent child care infrastructure to select excellent child care centers and to support operating expenses and to provide them with more strengthened operating standards).

C. On November 23, 2017, the Child Care Teachers D was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the following criminal facts in the Ulsan District Court Decision 2017Da2640 (child abuse) on the Child Welfare Act (child abuse), and D and the Prosecutor appealed (Ulsan District Court 2017No1553). On February 9, 2018, the appellate court reversed the first instance judgment and sentenced D to a stay of sentence of imprisonment (one million won for a fine), and the said judgment became final and conclusive as is.

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant (referring to Infant Care Teachers D; hereinafter the same shall apply) committed physical abuse that may harm the physical development of the victim in a way that the victim E (F) had another student live in music classes and is engaged in lessons, but the victim entered to toy bridges, and the victim got into the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the victim

At around 13:11 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed physical abuse that may harm the physical development of the victim by taking the victim’s arms and taking the victim’s body back because the victim did not concentrate at the time and did not go back to the time; and (b) taking the victim’s body back to the rubber line after her knishing.

On April 24, 2018, the Defendant selected a public child-care center of this case on the ground that the Plaintiff committed a violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse) against the Plaintiff.

arrow