logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.05.21 2019고단4378
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant knew of the personal information of Exemplary B living together with the aim of repaying bonds and raising money for living expenses, and used the credit card, authorized certificate, etc. in the name of B to obtain loans or to use the credit card in the name of B with the credit card issued in the name of B.

1. Events, such as writing, electronic records, etc.;

A. On March 21, 2018, the Defendant, at his own residence in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, did not have obtained the consent or delegation of a loan from B, sent the said card loan file to the above company loan manager who knows the above facts through a personal verification procedure by entering the name, resident registration number, etc. of D company in the column for the amount of loan of D company, and using an authorized certificate stored in the computer, after entering the name, resident registration number, etc. of B in the column for the amount of loan of D company in a computer.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged and exercised the card loan application file in B related to the rights and obligations with the aim of making the management of the business of the D Co., Ltd. in an excessive manner.

B. Around May 29, 2018, the Defendant did not have obtained the consent or delegation from B to re-issuance of a card at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) and on the Internet homepage of the E company, and applied for the re-issuance of a card, entered B’s name, resident registration number, etc. in the applicant’s personal information column stored in the computer, using B’s authorized certificate that was connected to the E company’s website, and transmitted the said file to the person in charge of the re-issuance of the said company’s card that knew of the aforementioned fact.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged B’s card re-issuance application files related to rights and obligations and exercised them for the purpose of interfering with the business affairs of the E company.

(c).

arrow