logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.18 2015고단1132 (1)
주민등록법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) his father was entrusted with a private taxi in pawned to Seoul; (b) was deprived of all money in a casino, and was unable to find a taxi; (c) the Defendant conspiredd to receive a loan in the name of C in the name of his relative C who is studying in Malaysia from Malaysia to his relative C.

1. On December 16, 2014, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act in collusion with D as above, and around 11:04 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a passbook in the name of C in the name of C in order to obtain a loan under the name of C; (b) filed a false report on the loss of the resident registration certificate; and (c) issued a written confirmation of the application for the issuance of the resident registration certificate in the name of C with a certified photograph attached to D.

2. In collusion with D, the Defendant, at around 12:15 on the same day, arrived at the celebing point of a Korean bank in which 1131-6 the right of publicity was instigated, and the Defendant waited outside the said place. D, within the said bank, filed an application for the establishment of a passbook with E (W, 37 years old) who is an employee of the bank, and submitted a written confirmation of the application for the issuance of a resident registration certificate under the name of C issued with a false content, as described in paragraph 1, with D, and subsequently rejected the application for issuance of a resident registration certificate, which is an official document.

3. In collusion with D, for the purpose of opening a passbook in the name of C even if the Defendant did not obtain any power or authorization from C at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, D acted as C, and D acted as if it were C, and written an application for new transaction, confirmation of financial transaction purpose, confirmation of illegal borrowed name transaction prohibition, explanation of FATCA No. C’s resident registration number, signature, etc. in the letter of private document, each of the above documents in the name of C with respect to rights and duties for the purpose of exercising the right and duties, and delivered them to the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1. Statements made in D in the fifth public trial records;

arrow