logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.07.26 2012고정250
입찰방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C Promotion Committee, while announcing a public announcement of “C business” on July 18, 2011, assessed the bid price of 20 points and the technical ability evaluation of 80 points and decided to select a priority negotiation target company and conclude a contract accordingly.

D Co., Ltd., the victim, constituted a window, Lone Star Co., Ltd. and D consortium on July 29, 201, and submitted a bid proposal on July 29, 2011, and was selected as a priority negotiation target company on August 5, 201 through an overall evaluation by the Evaluation Committee consisting of external evaluators and internal evaluators.

When the “E consortium”, which the Defendant had wished to be selected as an enterprise subject to preferential bargaining, went back in the process of the selection of the enterprise subject to preferential bargaining, the Defendant, in order to deprive the status of the enterprise subject to preferential bargaining of the status of the enterprise subject to preferential bargaining, had the person related to the “E consortium” examine the matters concerning the documents submitted by the “D consortium”, and planned to withdraw the documents on the grounds of minor loan, and to enter into a contract with the “E consortium” without pointed out the matters concerning the documents submitted by the “E consortium.”

The Defendant: (a) from July 30, 201 to July 30, 201, immediately after submitting bid documents, the Defendant disclosed the information by allowing H to peruse the documents submitted by “D consortium” to the president of G, a company in charge of Econsium (A/S) at the C Promotion Committee’s office located in Econsium, Cheongju-si; (b) on August 3, 2011, the “Dconsium” was designated as a priority negotiation target company; (c) reported its evaluation points to the I, the head of the site department, and said I would not be able to exercise influence to select the “Econsium” selected by him/her; and (d) on August 3, 2011, the name of the Defendant cannot be known to him/her.

arrow