beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
[Defendant B] Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A is a person who was detained in the Daejeon District Court on November 7, 2014, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of property acquisition at the Daejeon District Court on June 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2014. On November 17, 2014, and is currently pending in the appellate trial.
1. When Defendant A experienced economic difficulties in the absence of any particular occupation, the Defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident against the vehicles, etc. violating the signal, and colored the object of the crime with friendly arrest, E, F, and G on the DK5 vehicle, which helps the vehicle, etc. in violation of the signal to obtain the insurance money by deceiving the insurance money.
Around 19:00 on December 26, 2013, in collusion with E, F, and G, the Defendant discovered an I SM5 vehicle of HM5 vehicle before the meeting, in contravention of the signal, and partly caused the traffic accident by taking part of the above SM5 vehicle back to the left-hand part of the above 5 vehicle. On the same day, the above traffic accident was caused by the driver’s negligence, and the Defendant claimed insurance money by gathering personal information as B.
As above, the Defendant, in collusion with E, F, and G, deceiving the victim and caused the victim Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. to pay KRW 429,00 as the repair cost of the vehicle on December 28, 2013, and had the victims pay KRW 9,083,070 as the insurance money from that time to February 4, 2014, thereby having the victims pay KRW 9,083,070 as the insurance money, thereby obtaining property or property benefits equivalent to the same amount. From December 26, 2013 to September 14, 2014, the date of the occurrence of the said traffic accident, the Defendant was in collusion with the two persons on 17 occasions as above, and caused the traffic accident by intentionally marking the target vehicle with the vehicle and then caused the traffic accident under the name of the other party.