1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. On April 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the business of the victim E (n.e., 63 years old) located in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D market; (b) obstructed the business of the victim of the said 20 minute by force, such as, under the influence of alcohol, a restaurant table, a water reservoir, etc. located in the same place while drinkingly engaging in a dispute with B, and having continued to be kept by the beer and beer; and (c) obstructed the business of the said restaurant by force.

나. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 일시, 장소에서 위 E의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 울산 중부 경찰서 G 파출소 소속 경사 H, 경위 I로부터 미란다원칙 등을 고지 받고 위 업무 방해죄의 현행 범인으로 체포당하자, 불상의 위 시장 상인 등이 보는 가운데 위 경사 H에게 “ 야, 이 씹할 놈 아, 좆같은 새끼들 까불지 마라, 짜 바리 새끼들 아, 가만 안 둔다” 등의 욕설을 하면서 위 H의 어깨를 잡아당기고, 계속 하여 발로 낭 심 부분을 3회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B, on the ground that he was arrested as the current offender of the crime of interference with the business of Defendant B, at the above date, at the above time and place, on the ground that he was arrested as the offender of the crime of interference with the business of Defendant B, the above assistant H called “I are not inside,” and the above assistant Ha with warrant, and prevented the above A from arresting him.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Each written statement of J, E, and I;

1. Each investigation report and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) Defendant A: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties);

1. Defendants of the choice of punishment: Determination of a fine (Defendant A is to be sentenced to a fine before the opening, the victim, and the police officer.