Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From September 11, 2017 to 20:30 on September 11, 2017, the Defendants had worked together with G hotel located in F at the construction site of Seopopopopo-si, and had drinking, singing, and drinking at H “I” located in H located in Seopo-si. Defendant A reported 112 as property damage by destroying a singing room monitor attached to a microspon. Accordingly, the police officers of the Jan Police Station of Seopo-si Police Station came to move out at this place.
1. Defendant A, at the same place on the same day, at around 22:50, and at the same time, after receiving 112 reports on the same criminal facts as those set forth in the preceding paragraph, was called out and identified the facts, Defendant A examined what the police officer “.”
B. The phrase "in the process of doing harm," the k's arms in his hand, and the n't the police officer who has observed the k's arms.
“I see the language of “I”, “I see the governance?”
"Absent with N's body on the floor of hand and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning criminal investigations."
2. Defendant B committed an assault, at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time and place, and as seen above, obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to criminal investigations by assaulting a policeman who tried to arrest A as an offender of interference with the performance of official duties by sending the N’s face once.
3. When the defendant C was arrested as a current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as above, the defendant C was able to do so.
“In doing so, assaulting Ma’s chest by hand interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning criminal investigations.”
4. Defendant D, on the road above 22:58 on the same day, committed assault, such as arresting A and C as a current offender interfering with the performance of official duties and having them board a patrol vehicle, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to criminal investigation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ each.