Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 21, 2018, the Defendants entered a 'D' restaurant located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, Seoul-si, and Defendant B added tobacco to the restaurant table, spit it into the restaurant table, spit a spit of spit of spit in the restaurant, and spit it into the large spit of spit of spit of spit in the restaurant, and Defendant A put the spit of spit of spits in the following table table, and Defendant A put the spit of spit of spits in the following table. Defendant A puts the spit of spits, spit of spits, spons of spons, and spons of spons on the floor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the business of the cafeteria operated by the victim E for about one hour.

2. Defendant A, on the ground that Defendant F, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1, was aware of the fact that Defendant F, who was affiliated with the Police Station of the Ansan-gu Police Station of the National Police Station of the National Police Station of the National Police Station of the National Police Station of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, confirmed the Defendant’s conduct of interfering with his/her duties, he/she committed assaulting the Defendant, such as: (a) having a restaurant proprietor and his/her employees, stating that “I am out, I am out,” and “I am out,” and threatening the police officer, on the ground that he/she was in contact with the Defendant, with the police officer, to arrest the Defendant as a current offender interfering with his/her duties; and (b) threatening the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant insultingd the victim, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases.

3. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place described in paragraph 1, the police officer sent his body to F, who is the defective police officer, in order to arrest Defendant B, who is a criminal of interference with his duty, as the current criminal of interference with his duty, and assaulted the head and face of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;