1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a church belonging to the religious organization B, and the plaintiff is the defendant's member who is in the position of funeral.

On July 30, 2017, a resolution on the amendment of the articles of incorporation (hereinafter referred to as the “resolution of this case”) containing the establishment of Articles 6-1 and 6-2 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation (hereinafter referred to as “instant provisions”) was adopted on July 30, 2017, among those registered as the members of the Defendant’s joint council, as those aged 19 or older who were registered as the members of the Defendant’s association (Article 5 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation).

Article 6-1 of the defendant's articles of incorporation and the provisions of this case are as follows.

Article 6-1 (False Voting on Road)

1. A non-voting vote shall be held every seven years after the beginning of his/her service and beginning of his/her service with respect to an armed riot;

(Article 4 of the Constitution of the Assembly)

2. On or before the last day of every seven years after the beginning of Si affairs, Si affairs shall be organized into Si affairs and Si affairs, and the head of Si affairs shall be the head of Si affairs (Article 6 of the Articles of Incorporation of the defendant). On or after the opening of Si affairs, a Si affairs shall continue to be held by the joint council with the consent of the majority of the voters, and if a majority is not obtained, the head of Si affairs shall be the head of Si affairs;

3. Provided, That the schedule for the implementation of a non-voting may be adjusted at the meeting of the Council, if necessary;

Article 6-2 (Restriction on Piloting of Si Armed Forces) If an armed riot falls under any of the following cases, the jurisdiction of the Si Armed Forces may be restricted by a deliberation and resolution of the City Council:

1. Where he/she commits an act contrary to the matters lawfully decided at a party meeting, or makes a statement contrary to the decision openly;

2. The plaintiff's argument that the resolution of this case is null and void due to any of the following defects, and thus, the plaintiff is seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of this case. The plaintiff is seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of this case. The plaintiff is seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of this case, since the plaintiff's argument that this case's resolution of this case's resolution of this case's 1-3, No. 4 and No. 13,

The provision of this case is to be applied to the plaintiff.