beta
Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
3. The total cost of the lawsuit is indicated as the representative of the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff was a church that belongs to the religious order previously set up in the A religious organization’s reform (hereinafter “former religious order”). From September 200, the Plaintiff decided to take advantage of the situation without joining any of the divided meetings at the A religious organization’s meeting on October 200, when the above general meeting appears to have been divided into the Drown General Assembly, the Sungdong General Assembly, and the Hong Dong General Assembly, and around October 200, to take advantage of the situation.
B. According to the Constitution of a different religious order (hereinafter “Constitution”) the religious order (1) as an employee of a church who is a representative of the members, the term of time for a pastor who concurrently serves as the head of the church and the head of the church. The term of time for a pastor as the head of the church is seventy years of age, the term of time for a pastor as the head of the church is seventy-five years of age, the term of time for a pastor as the head of the church is seventy-five years of age, and the term of time for a pastor as the head of the church is two-thirds or more of the members of the political party or the members of the faculty, if there is a petition of one-third or more of the three-third of the members of the faculty or the members of the faculty, a new vote shall be held at the joint council. (2) The council shall decide on the attendance and retirement of the members of the branch church, supervise the members of the church, and shall be decided by a resolution of the majority of the members of the church, and the number of the members of the branch church shall be selected as an organization.
C. Around January 15, 2001, the Plaintiff was the president of the party branch at the time of the Plaintiff’s around January 15, 2001, and F.m. F among G, H, I, J, J, K, L, M, N, andO (hereinafter “G et al.”) among the 17-person Si roads constituting the party branch of the party branch of the 17-person, who was set up the retirement age on December 15, 201.