The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, the fact that the person involved in the philopon actively cooperates in the investigation; (b) there is no record of punishment for narcotics-related crimes; and (c) the fact that the degree of damage caused by the refusal to leave is not significant; (d) the fact that the person committed each crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the person was committed a repeated crime due to the crime of this type; and (e) the fact that the philopon was administered in multiple times; and (e) the fact that the philopon was an reaction

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.