The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the facts leading up to the confession of the crime, the two times of simple medication, etc., the fact that there was a history of punishment for the same crime, the fact that each of the instant crimes was committed without being able to do so even during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the fact that the response to the training of phiphonephones as a result of the evaluation of the urine and the maternity, etc., the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be undue, too,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.