The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for and frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; (c) the fact that the crime is a simple medication; (d) the several times of punishment for the same kind of crime; (e) the fact that the crime was committed during the period of repeated crime; and (e) the response to the training of phiphonephones as a result

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.