The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one and half years of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of crime, frequency of crime, method of crime, circumstance after crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of crime, method of crime, etc.; (b) the fact that the investigation agency led to each of the instant crimes without being aware of the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime; (c) the fact that the phiphone medication was given to C who has no record of phiphone-phone medication; (d) the fact that the phi-phone medication was an reaction to the phi-phone training; and (e) the fact that the phi-phone training was conducted

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.