The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant was led to the confession of the crime and against the Defendant; (b) the quantity of phiphonephones handled is not large; (c) the fact that it is a simple medication crime; (d) the Defendant was punished for the same crime; (e) the Defendant was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; and (e) the Defendant continued to commit the remaining crime of this case even though he was arrested as part of the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant was the response to the training of phiphonephones

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.