1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From August 6, 2011 to B (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) performed cleaning work at a kindergarten B (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) on August 16, 201, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “influent salt in the front direction” and “influence in the front direction,” and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant due to the accidents involving the part of the elbel part of the elbanes on the front corner in the book (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On December 5, 2012, the Defendant approved the medical care of the “componioned salt unit”, but rendered the instant disposition to refuse medical care on the ground of the advisory opinion that the “componed satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satis

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case occurred due to the accident of this case or rapidly aggravated beyond the natural progress, and thus, constitutes an occupational accident, despite the fact that it constitutes an occupational accident, the instant disposition based on the Defendant’s different premise is unlawful.

B. The facts of recognition (1) The Plaintiff, while cleaning around 15:00 on August 16, 201, 201, she faced with a corner on a book. On the same day, the Plaintiff was given medical treatment at a wooden Central Hospital on August 27, 201, and received RI photographs on August 29, 201, and received an unbruptive compacting repact around the front line.

(2) On June 21, 201, the Plaintiff entered the medical record with C outside Korea and the medical record as “Fisher and right Lel.” On August 17, 2011, the Plaintiff entered it as “Seo EL......................................., the Plaintiff was treated as an injury or disease of the past

(3) The Plaintiff was 1961 and was 50 years of age at the time of the instant accident.

(4) Medical opinions pertaining to the instant injury and disease are as follows.

(A) On August 29, 201, Plaintiff Hapo-si (Yanpo-Central Hospital)’s main hospital of the Republic of Korea (Spopopo-si), the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs (Spo-si)