The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From November 19, 2008 to June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff served as a transferee at a stock company B (hereinafter “instant business establishment”) and returned to the instant business establishment on January 10, 2018, and served as the transferee and the president by September 9, 2018.

On September 12, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “original sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsivesponsivesponsivesponsives, both sponsivesponsivesponsivesponsive sponsivesponsive

B. On February 20, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision to approve the medical care (hereinafter referred to as the “decision to approve the medical care of this case”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s “satisonitis outside the front direction is recognized to have a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work, and on the ground that the Defendant’s decision to approve the medical care of the “satisonitis outside the front direction,” on the ground that “the first instance court’s decision to approve the medical care of the Plaintiff on the ground that it is recognized to have a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work.” The Defendant: “The first instance court’s decision to approve the medical care of this case’s disease” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant medical treatment of this case’s disease”).

C. On July 18, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant against the instant disposition. However, the Defendant dismissed the request on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s motion for review was dismissed on the ground that it was difficult to deem that the Plaintiff had worked for a period of less than one year after re-admission in 2014 with the Plaintiff’s work force in 2018, as it was difficult to deem that the Plaintiff had worked for a period of less than one year.”