logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.10.17 2016구단1282
재요양 및 추가상병 불승인처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of additional medical care and the disposition of non-approval of additional injury or disease rendered to the Plaintiff on November 8, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 3, 2011, the Plaintiff, who became a member of the Chang Industrial Co., Ltd. and transported food, waste, etc., was receiving the injury or disease in the sponsion of the sponsor and the sponsor, and received the first medical care benefit approval for each of the above injury or disease from the Defendant, and received medical care until August 27, 2016 (the closing date of medical care).

B. 1) On September 2, 2016, the Plaintiff is the Defendant’s spawn spawnitis and partial spawn fever (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”).

(2) On November 8, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for additional medical care or additional medical care for the injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) with the Plaintiff on the ground that the instant injury and disease does not constitute an additional injury and disease, and that the operation is unnecessary.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful or not

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had no choice but to use the shoulder repeatedly by putting heavy food waste (40 to 50km) more than twice a day, putting the floor of the workplace by putting it off by selling and putting it out on hand, etc. The Plaintiff caused the instant wound due to such repeated work.

The plaintiff previously obtained the approval of medical care for the pre-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-speaking re-s

Ultimately, the instant difference is deemed as the Plaintiff’s work or the existing injury or disease aggravated, and thus, the instant disposition rejecting additional medical care is unlawful.

B. 1) On July 17, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to the Plaintiff’s treatment at the Incheon National University International Shipping Bag-si Hospital, and the Plaintiff was subject to the Plaintiff’s revolving revolving revolving the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the back of the opening of the opening of the opening of the back of the opening of the opening of the back of the opening of the opening of the back of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening

B At the time, self-official image (MRI) is located.

arrow