logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.20 2017나308673
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an appeal for the right shoulder, etc. with the Defendant’s “B Hanwon” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). On July 11, 201, the Defendant, under the order of heating treatment, damp corrosion, interference current treatment devices (electric treatment devices using interference currents with the ICT Inc.). On July 12, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the treatment had been carried out by the Defendant on the right shoulder and right shoulder, and the Defendant did not receive any further treatment at the Defendant Hospital on July 23, 2014, the Plaintiff was informed of the fact that the Plaintiff was under the influence of Hanwon Hospital’s 1, 205, 7, 7, 7, 5, 7, 7, 7, 5, 7, 5, 5, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1, 5, 1, 4, 5, 1, 4, ., 1, 4, ., ., 1, 7, .

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1 and 6 through 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant had an excessive electric shock during the process of the interference and current therapy against the Plaintiff, and due to these medical malpractices, the Defendant caused severe pains on the Defendant’s shoulder and caused severe pains, and the Plaintiff’s assertion was “herhing off the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to the back to

Therefore, the defendant is therefore attributable to the plaintiff.

arrow