beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is a dentist who operates a dental clinic in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dental Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
B. On February 16, 2013, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant Hospital to undergo an examination by the Defendant. As a result of the examination, the Plaintiff was in a state that he was not absent the Plaintiff’s 27, 36, 37, 46, 47, and 26, and there was a dust remaining in 15, 16, 17, 17, 34, 35, 34, 44, 45, and 45. However, while the Plaintiff was in a state where he was in a state that he was found to have left, the entire scrap was composed of 34, 35, and 35 on the part of the Plaintiff.
C. Accordingly, the Defendant explained to the Plaintiff on the same day the merger certificates, etc. that may arise due to the crypt operation, and received the Plaintiff’s consent, and provided treatment, such as the treatment of the crypt remaining crypt of the crypt and 35 and 44 crypt of the crypt.
In addition, the Defendant recovered patriarche No. 34, April 34, 2013, and cut eggs on the part of patriarche No. 26, Sept. 25, 2013 (hereinafter “instant procedure”), and cut eggs on the part of patrie No. 35, Nov. 6, 2013, and No. 36, and 37, and cut eggs on the part of patriarche No. 16, Jun. 16, 2014. The Defendant recovered patriarche No. 17, Nov. 3, 2014.
E. However, on December 23, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant for inconvenience, such as internal autopsy and oral pain, and the Defendant confirmed the Plaintiff’s state of dental care, and provided treatment to the Plaintiff on the basis of the Plaintiff’s symptoms in dental services No. 25 and No. 34, and then requested the Seoul National University Dental Hospital to provide treatment to the Plaintiff on January 13, 2015.
F. The Plaintiff received medical treatment at a dental hospital of Seoul National University on January 14, 2015 and around the 28th day of the same month. If the Plaintiff appeals to the continuous inconvenience, the hospital is replaced by 26 and 27.