1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 16, 2011, the Plaintiff, who is a dentist, was within a dental hospital in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by the Defendant, and was under the overall dental examination and consultation with the Defendant, and was under the crypt procedure from the Defendant.

B. On February 18, 2011, the Defendant: (a) laid the Plaintiff’s upper left-hand 24,26, and laid the eggs accompanied by bones transplant on the upper left-hand side of 24,25,26,27; and (b) laid the eggs accompanied by bones transplantation on the upper right-hand side of 16,11; (c) laid the eggs accompanied by bones transplantation on the upper right-hand side of 17, 36,37; (d) 46, 47, 47, the upper right-hand left-hand side of fry; and (e) laid the eggs on the upper right-hand side of flaps No. 17, Aug. 16, 201; and (e) laid the eggs on the upper right-hand side of flaps No. 36,37; and (e) laid the eggs on the upper right-hand side of flaps No. 17, 2011; (e) laid off 36, 2746, 7, 27. 147.

After all, the plaintiff constantly complained of the pain of the upper left-hand side, the defendant removed the column of the upper left-hand side of the upper left-hand side of 26,27 on December 26, 201, and on June 19, 2012, re-established on the same part indicated on the upper left-hand side of 26 on June 19, 2012 (25 on the medical record in the first case, it seems that the first case was re-established on the same part as the upper left-hand side of 26 on the medical record, which seems to be a clerical error of 26). However, on the part of the upper left-hand side of 100, the plaintiff re-established the column of the upper part on July 23, 2012 by the plaintiff's continuous appeal of the plaintiff, but removed again the column of the lower part on July 26, 2012.

(hereinafter referred to as “the part on the left-hand side of the No. 26,27” shall be called the part on the left-hand side of the No. 13,00, and the part on the above part on the No. 130,000 shall be referred to as “the part on the left-hand side of the No. 130,000.”

The plaintiff is currently unable to do so due to the influoral disorder caused by the disturbance failure of the part above the left-hand side of the case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including virtual numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1, or images, and the President of the Korea University Cancer Hospital at the Sin University.