logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.18 2015나16603
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 28, 2011, the Plaintiff applied to Cental Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). At the time, the Plaintiff’s state of infant care and symptoms complaining of the Plaintiff are as follows.

No. 12 medical treatment of 11-12-13 patonia, however, an appeal for reduction of inconvenience due to the loss of fatia No. 44-46, due to the loss of fatia No. 47, No. 13 in the state of 11-12-13 in the state of fatia, the 13th in the state of the distribution of fatia, the fatia, the 36,37 in the state of catia and the cata in the state of catia after the treatment of the fatia, the 35 in the left part of the fatia, the 45 in the state of fatia due to the loss of fatia, the 45-46 in the state of fatasia due to the loss of fatia, the 47 in the fatia.

B. From December 1, 2011 to March 29, 2012, the Defendant treated the Plaintiff as follows.

After removing existing universal hardware from the right upper to the left upper tier (11, 12, 13, 21) on December 1, 201, to the left upper tier (11, 12, 13, and 21) the removal of existing universal aggregate, the removal of temporary universal aggregate products, the completion of the dental treatment of the right upper vis-to the right upper tier on December 15, 201, and the completion of the new vegetable treatment of the new vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, and vegetable vegetable from the right upper tier to the middle vegetable, the temporary vegetable vege 2 of the existing vegetable vege vege vege 2 of the new vege vege vege 2 of the new vege vege vege 2 of the right upper vege.2 of the new vege vete.21.2 of the existing vege.2 of the existing vege.

C. On March 6, 2012, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant, under the left-hand side, with heavy pains and smells of the flusium, and the Defendant filed an appeal with the Defendant through the appropriate unity of the flusium and the flusium for the same day-flusium.

arrow