1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. On April 16, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed and treated by a dental clinic (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant dental clinic”) for the purpose of co-ordination under the presumption of disability, where inconvenience was continued, under the dental clinic (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant dental clinic”) for the purpose of co-ordination, under the dental clinic (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant dental clinic”) for the purpose of coordinating the problem, with the dental clinic’s pain and low time inconvenience on April 23, 2012.

B. The Plaintiff filed a dental clinic with Defendant on August 9, 2012, and the Defendant on August 9, 2012:

9. 6. After a clinical examination, such as radiation shooting (marama, dental CT, etc.) and oral examination, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were established with a treatment plan (26, 27, dental therapy, 36, 37, 46, 46, and so on) and consulted thereon.

C. On September 14, 2012, the Defendant launched a structural fixed system (SAS: Ske Anchorage Ske Anchorage Sym) for correction and treatment of dental babies No. 26, and No. 27 on September 24, 2012, following the Plaintiff’s 36,37 Abrosion accompanied by a cromothing surgery, and started to pressure Abrops on October 26, 2012.

Since then, while the defendant was performing continuous correctional pressure and correctional treatment for the plaintiff 26,27 on September 2012 through October 46, 2012, he re-produced ad hoc divers, which was made on October 12 of the same year, temporarily connected the divers of the divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers divers dives 26,27.

E. Upon the Plaintiff’s deprivation of temporary dental services on January 7, 2013, the Defendant executed temporary re-explosive measures against the said baby on May 6, 2013, and thereafter, conducted a re-explosive surgery on May 6, 2013, and conducted a re-explosive surgery on the part of the said baby on May 36, 37, 2013, and conducted a re-explosive procedure on the part of the said baby on the 42th dental license, and taken the radioactive rays on the 11th dental license.