logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단6007
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A business owner who operates a childcare center that meets the requirements for applying for subsidies for workplace skill development training expenses may entrust infant care teachers to another training institution to conduct workplace skill development training for infant care teachers, and where infant care teachers have completed such training, he/she may receive subsidies from the Human Resources Development Service of Korea of victims in an amount equivalent to the training expenses

In order to receive subsidies as above, a business owner entered into an entrustment contract for workplace skill development training with an educational institution certified as a course of education by the Human Resources Development Service of Korea and an infant care teacher, and paid training expenses in advance to the entrusted training institution, and in the case of a collective training course where an infant care teacher, who is subject to education, directly finds the entrusted training institution and receives education, he/she must attend at least 80% of the certified training hours of the training course and complete the training course.

Criminal facts

No person shall receive subsidies by making any false application or by other unlawful means.

The Defendant, the representative of the CLifelong Education Center, from May 11, 2013 to October 19, 2014, was a C Lifelong Education Center operated by the Defendant on the second and second floors in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and conducted vocational development training for infant care teachers by being entrusted by the business owner operating the child care center with vocational development training for infant care teachers.

The Defendant, while conducting vocational development training as above, concerns that the education center operated by the Defendant would not entrust the training of infant care teachers, and the fact was not received in advance from child care centers, and the infant care teachers, who are the trainees of the above training course, did not attend the training course at least 80% of the training hours.

arrow