logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.24 2012고단5824 (1)
사기등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two months and by imprisonment for not more than eight months for the remaining crimes as stated in the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 5824] On October 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor due to fraud, etc. at the Suwon Giwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 4, 201.

1. On October 18, 201, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) at the Gu civil petition office in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) on the column in the location of real estate located in the location of the “commercial lease agreement” by means of a computer, the Defendant: (c) “203 of the second floor on operation of the apartment building on the 2nd floor in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon Special Metropolitan City; (d)” and “50,000 won on October 18, 201; and (e) on the remaining column, paid on the 18th of October, 201; (c) “50,000 won on the 6th of October; and (d) written out the “F” and the “A” column in the lessor’s name and sealed the Defendant at his own discretion after the lessor’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the commercial lease agreement in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 24, 2012, the Defendant held the instant investigation document at the “G” restaurant operated by the Defendant’s 203th floor in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the second floor, and at the same time, alcoholic beverages also presented the forged commercial lease contract completion as if they were duly constituted, as set forth in paragraph 1, to the head of the business division of H (ju).

3. On February 24, 2012, the fraud Defendant presented a forged commercial lease agreement with the head of the business division of the Victim (State) H lending KRW 20 million with the funds to support the transaction of this alcoholic beverage to the head of the business division of the Victim (State) H during the period from March 28, 2012 to October 28, 2013, stating that the Defendant would pay KRW 1 million each month over 20 times.

However, the above restaurant did not have the right to the above lease deposit to the defendant that the Korea Legal Welfare Corporation paid the lease deposit of 50 million won as a business start-up support project and concluded a lease contract with the owner of the building.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it, 20 million won around the time of the damage.

arrow