Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violating the Defense Justice at the Seoul Central District Court for the same year.

9.24. The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On September 16, 2014, the Defendant was present at the inspection room of Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office (Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office) located in 390, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, as a witness in relation to the fraud regarding Defendant B, and was subject to investigation.

In relation to the above investigation process, the Defendant, upon request from the relevant prosecutor E to submit a real estate lease contract capable of proving this in relation to the statement that “(State office) C, which operated as a partnership business with B, was transferred to D on November 2012, 2012,” the Defendant agreed to submit the said contract. However, at the time of the investigation, the Plaintiff and the lessor did not have a lease contract because they did not prepare a lease contract with the lessor F at the time, and they did not hold both themselves and the lessor.

On September 20, 2014, at its office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G 402, the Defendant without authority for the purpose of exercising, and without authority, entered the monthly rent contract form in the column in which the location was located, “1,00,000 won”, “9,000 won” in the contract column, “1,00,000 won” in the remainder column, “1,000 won” in the leased column, “0 November 01, 2013” in the lessor’s lawsuit column, “F” in the lessor’s name column, “F” in the lessor’s name column, and “B” in the lessee’s name column. After printing it, the Defendant was in possession of the F’s name in advance.

F's seal has been stamped.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a monthly rent contract in the name of lessor F, which is a private document on proof of fact.

2. On September 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) issued to the Prosecutor’s Office No. 318 of the above Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, a forged monthly contract document to the Prosecutor E as if the document was duly formed, and exercised the same.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. A copy of the monthly brief;

1. Judgment.