logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.30 2015고단5818
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2011, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated in the column for the location of the site for the real estate lease contract by using a typesetting tool in the body of the Defendant’s residence located underground in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) stated in the column for the size of the site for the real estate lease contract “33 square meters on the surface”; (c) stated in the column for the deposit for the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis; (d) stated in the column for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit for the deposit; and (e) stated in the column for the deposit for the deposit for the down payment, “0 million won on a deposit basis”; and (e) stated in the column for the lessor’s name, resident registration number, address, and telephone number in the column for the deposit.”

D affixes their seals respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one set of the lease contract under the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 18, 2011, the Defendant presented a forged lease agreement with the victim E at the office of a person who was in a fluorial box located in Suwon-si filmdong, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as set forth in paragraph 1, and the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “F is able to repay as if it borrowed KRW 25 million to F, if it borrowed KRW 25 million to F, it would have received the lease deposit after three months.”

However, the above real estate was directly managed by the father of the defendant, and the defendant was living on the underground of the above building, and the lease contract was not concluded, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the money properly even if he borrowed money from the damaged person due to no particular property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and obtained 25 million won from the victim as the borrowed money, and acquired it by fraud, and presented the lease contract in the name of D, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations forged as provided in paragraph (1), to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow