1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant A’s KRW 46,020,064 and KRW 15,078,802 among them:

B. Defendant B is Defendant A.

1. A cited part;

A. An indication of the claim No. 1 HK Mutual Savings Bank’s attempted balance of modern withdrawal on the date of the agreement on loan of a financial institution, and 1 HK Mutual Savings Bank’s special credit card No. 16. 16. 2,266,585,000,7712 8,358,94623,520,592 3,426,6882,2434, 6034, 1,026,60,603,656 combined loan No. 15,078,802,942,2626,062,062,0641) was not issued or paid to Defendant A’s new credit card No. 24,201, as of the loan’s credit card No. 18,946,262,0641).

3) The Plaintiff acquired the claim against the Defendants from each financial institution listed in the above table, and received delegation of the authority to notify the transfer from each financial institution, and notified the Defendant A of the fact of transferring the claim. B. The judgment by each service by public notice based on recognition (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The dismissal part of the Plaintiff asserts that in addition to the above claims, the Defendant A acquired the special credit amount of the Solomonmon Mutual Savings Bank’s 6,542,616 won (i.e., KRW 1.6 million (i., KRW 4,942,616) (i.e., KRW 1.6 million) against the Defendant, but there is no evidence to deem that the Defendant A engaged in the above loan transaction. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for this part