logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.19 2017나2032648
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant against the plaintiff B shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A was in the form of voluntary operation by the investigator of the Central Information Department at the home of the branch of Gyeonggi-do, around 08:30 on October 18, 1975, after having graduated from the college of the Republic of Korea around March 1974, the plaintiff A was in the Republic of Korea at the Korean National University Research Institute of the Republic of Korea from March 1, 1975. 2) The plaintiff A was in the form of voluntary operation by the investigator of the central Information Department at the home of the branch of Gyeonggi-do, which is in the Republic of Korea C.

The investigator of the Central Information Department prepared a written statement stating that “The Plaintiff’s confession of a crime, such as violation of the National Security Act, was forced by blocking the contact with the outside while detained the Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff’s confession was blicked, not locked, etc., and the Plaintiff A drafted a written statement stating that “The Plaintiff was locked into the Republic of Korea under the order of an anti-government organization, and discovered the State secrets.”

Plaintiff

A was bound by a warrant of detention issued by the court on November 3, 1975.

3) After that, Plaintiff A was indicted as Seoul Criminal Court 75 Gohap988,993 (Joint) on the facts charged of violating the National Security Act. The summary of the facts charged is that “The Plaintiff produced expressions of North Korea, which are anti-government organizations, such as North Korea from 1971 to 1974, with culture on the South Korean Revolution, Kim Il-Japanese ideology, socialist friendship, etc., and reported to the members of anti-government organizations. On March 1975, Plaintiff A was convicted of the charges of violation of the National Security Act by having contacted university students in the Republic of Korea while attending the research institute of the Seoul National University of Korea, and by having contacted university students in the Republic of Korea, and discovered and collected national secrets, such as military secrets, etc., and by gathering North Korea’s broadcasts and publicly announcing the intention to thoroughly implement the unification project by the subject of Kim Il-il's Kim, and encouraging the activities of North Korea, which are anti-government organizations, and by praiseing the activities of North Korea.”

arrow