1. The defendant attached Form to the plaintiffs

1. The “official amount” on the prize amount sheet for each plaintiff is written in each money and each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A is a Korean national residing in the Republic of Korea born from J in 1981. The Plaintiff A completed the education center for Korean nationals residing in the Republic of Korea in Seoul University in October 1982, and served as a Japanese full-time lecturer at L Training Institute from October 1983 through the Japanese full-time lecturer at K Education Center in October 1982. (2) On June 28, 1986, Plaintiff A followed by the investigator affiliated with the Defendant’s military security headquarters (hereinafter “security officer”) under the National Security Act, etc. by the investigator affiliated with the Defendant’s military security headquarters in the located in the located area of the house.

3) After that, by the time of issuance of a detention warrant on August 4, 1982, investigators employed Plaintiff A’s custody without the warrant of the judge of the court. During the process of investigating Plaintiff A, investigators affiliated with the security officer forced the Plaintiff A to make a confession with the content that the Plaintiff had been subject to an anti-government organization’s order and forced the Plaintiff to find out and collect national secrets in Korea. During that process, the investigators engaged in harsh acts, such as: (i) Plaintiff A’s tata, and not going back, etc.; (ii) during the prosecutorial investigation stage, the Plaintiff did not have received the assistance of counsel; (iii) the security investigator would be subject to re-investigation at the security officer’s office if the security investigator did not find the Plaintiff A and commit a crime; and (iv) the Plaintiff’s surveillance was carried out from time to time by the prosecutor’s office.

Plaintiff

A If it is intended to clarify any part different from the facts, the prosecutor in charge again sent the security history to the investigator in charge and requested cooperation from the investigator in charge, thereby recognizing the contents of the security history investigation.

B. The Plaintiff A was prosecuted for violating the National Security Act (such as a espionage, etc.) by Seoul Criminal District Court 86 Gohap1171, and the summary of the facts charged is as follows: “The Plaintiff’s “I will examine the actual living conditions and inconsistency of the people’s living conditions on the South-North Korean Haon,” from the person who was unaware of the name of the Director for the North Korean Round, and at all times, I will look at the situation of the people’s living in the South-North Korean Haon.