1. The Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A, KRW 654,956,00, KRW 120,00 for each of the Plaintiff B, C, D, and E; and (b) to each of them on May 22, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A was a Korean national born from the Republic of Korea in April 1970 and completed education research institutes for Korean nationals residing abroad at the Seoul National University and entered the G department of the Seoul National University (Seoul National University). However, on October 12, 1975, the investigators belonging to the Central Information Department affiliated with the defendant, who were enrolled in the fourth year of the Seoul National University, were bound by the court’s warrant and investigated the plaintiff A into the state of illegal confinement for 21 days from the date of issuance of detention warrant on November 1, 1975, without the judge’s warrant. The investigators belonging to the Central Information Department, who were affiliated with the defendant, conducted an investigation into the state of lawful confinement for 21 days from the date of issuance of detention warrant, by having the plaintiff A not locked to the plaintiff during the aforementioned illegal confinement, or by having the plaintiff s embling him with clothes, laveding him, laveing him, and labing him with clothes and humpings and humpings.

3) On November 20, 1975, Plaintiff A was sent to the Seoul District Prosecutor’s Office. During the investigation conducted by the Prosecutor, Plaintiff A made a statement to the effect that he/she led to the confession of suspected facts, as stated in the Seoul District Prosecutor’s Information Department. On December 9, 1975, the prosecutor affiliated with the Seoul District Prosecutor’s Office charged Plaintiff A with anti-public law violations as indicated in the separate sheet, the National Security Act violations, and espionage charges (Seoul Criminal District Court Decision 75Da983). (b) The judgment of conviction and 1) The Seoul District Criminal Prosecutor’s Office was prepared on April 3, 1976, by the prosecutor’s partial statement of Plaintiff A, the protocol of interrogation of the prosecutor’s interrogation of the said Plaintiff, the judicial police officer affiliated with the Central Information Department.