1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of money stated in the "personal fee" column for each plaintiff in the attached amount calculation sheet.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties A is that Plaintiff A is the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea,

B. On March 1975, Plaintiff A entered the Republic of Korea as a prospective student and entered the National Education Research Institute Re-Seoul National University, and completed the above research institute on December 10, 1975. 2) On December 14, 1975, the investigators belonging to the National Information Department forced Plaintiff A to leave the Republic of Korea from the Kimpo-si supply port of Kimpo-si on December 14:00 to the Republic of Korea without any explanation.

In this case, the above investigators did not present a warrant to the Plaintiff A, or did not notify the facts constituting the crime and the right to appoint counsel, and did not provide the Plaintiff A with an opportunity to defend himself.

3) Plaintiff A forced the Plaintiff to put his eye into the Central Information Department near Seoul Southernsan, and led the Defendant to the Central Information Department prior to the issuance of a detention warrant from around December 27, 1975, and was detained without a warrant until December 27, 1975, and was investigated into the violation of the National Security Act, anti-public law, and espionage, etc. The investigator in charge of the Central Information Department forced the Plaintiff to make a confession of the suspected crime during the investigation into the Plaintiff, and forced the Plaintiff A to make a confession during the investigation into the Defendant, and the Plaintiff A signed and sealed the suspect interrogation statement to the effect that the suspected facts were raised several times due to the above cruel act and the unfair prolongedness of physical restraint, etc., or prepared and submitted a written statement of identification to the investigator in charge of the National Security Act. The Plaintiff A and the Seoul District Court convicted Plaintiff A of violation of the National Security Act for 16 years through the prosecution and the prosecution of the Defendant 16.7.16.7.