logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018.2.8. 선고 2017두503 판결
시정명령등취소청구의소
Cases

2017Du503 Action for revocation, such as a corrective order

Plaintiff, Appellee

A Stock Company

Defendant Appellant

Fair Trade Commission

Defendant Intervenor Appellant

B A.

Judgment of remand

Supreme Court Decision 2012Du25378 Decided February 12, 2015

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu778 Decided August 18, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

February 8, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the costs of appeal are assessed against the Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendant.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices

February 8, 2018

Judges

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Lee Ki-taik

Justices Park Jung-hwa

arrow