logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.3.24. 선고 2015두4006 판결
시정명령등취소청구
Cases

2015Du4006 Demanding revocation, such as a corrective order

Plaintiff, Appellee

Samopgly Lina Co., Ltd. (former trade name: Samopglas Co., Ltd.)

Defendant Appellant

Fair Trade Commission

Intervenor joining the Defendant

LAB Co., Ltd.

Judgment of remand

Supreme Court Decision 2011Du7991 Decided March 14, 2013

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu9931 Decided November 5, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

March 24, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant’s Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices

March 24, 2016

Judges

Justices Kim Chang-suk

Justices Lee Sang-hoon

Justices Jo Hee-de

Justices Park Sang-ok

arrow