Text
1. The Defendants jointly hold the shares of 40,489,713 won and the Appointed SP Korea.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff’s driver, the designated vehicle owner, the Defendant B, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle D 11 ton cargo vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”), and the Defendant National Cargo Transport Business Federation (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant B to guarantee liability for damages caused by the Defendant’s vehicle accident.
B. At around 08:40 on January 22, 2014, Defendant B, while driving Defendant B, while driving the Defendant’s vehicle at the front intersection of the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-do, Seongbuk-do, Seongbuk-do, the Plaintiff, who was on the left left due to the negligence of violating the signal, was shocked on the Plaintiff’s vehicle.
(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff was unable to be locked due to the instant accident, and suffered injury, such as cerebral leins, climatic salt and tensions, and satise satisfying, which require two-time medical treatment. The Plaintiff suffered injury to the Plaintiff, who had no open address.
C. On March 6, 2014, Defendant B filed a summary order against Defendant B for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents that “The Plaintiff sustained injury requiring approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to negligence causing the instant accident,” and the summary order of KRW 700,000 was finalized around that time.
[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, Gap evidence 10, Gap evidence 12-1, 2, Gap evidence 12-2, Gap evidence 13, Gap evidence 24, 25, Eul evidence 3, and Eul evidence 14-1 through 8;
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, Defendant B is jointly liable for each of the damages suffered by the Plaintiff and the designated parties due to the instant accident pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the Defendant Federation is jointly liable for the mutual aid business of Defendant B as the mutual aid business
B. The Defendants subject to limitation of liability are also neglecting the Plaintiff’s view at a reasonable speed.