1. The Defendants: (a) each of the plaintiffs A was gold 133,976,901 won; (b) gold 130,226,901 won; and (c) gold 4,000 won for the plaintiff C and D respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) around January 13, 2014, Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) was owned by the Defendant Junghrenk Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and run a Fcar leased from the Defendant Company (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) to pass through the crosssection in front of the upper sloping road at the time of the port of the license examination site at the speed of 60 km per hour from the front of the front sloping road at the time of the port of Heung-gu when he was permitted to pass. The vehicle signal, etc. was changed to the red light, but the vehicle signal, etc. was turned to the red light, but proceed without stopping, and the Defendant E was completely able to take the left side of the vehicle of Nonparty G driving, which was going to the port to the port of the left side of the Defendant Magak vehicle.

(hereinafter “the instant accident”). At the time of the accident, the Plaintiff Oral Ba was accompanied by Nonparty H and the deceased I (JB; hereinafter “the deceased”). However, the Deceased was sent to the hospital and received treatment, but it was deceased at the brain expenses around 00:45 on February 12, 2014.

(2) The Plaintiff A and B are the parents of the Deceased, and the Plaintiff C is the deceased’s punishment, and the Plaintiff D is the mother of the Deceased.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 8, Eul evidence No. 3 through 7, Eul evidence No. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the accident in this case occurred due to the mistake that Defendant E, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, violated the vehicle signal, neglected the duty of the front section and the left section, and the Defendant Company is the operator of the Defendant vehicle, and the Defendants are jointly liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the accident in this case during the operation of the said vehicle.

C. Limit of liability, however, at the time of the instant accident, the Deceased did not wear a safety cap while on board the Tobane, and the Deceased was also 125c.